Graffiti cannot be accurately classified as vandalism because the public property is not destroyed, but made to look stunning. Graffiti is art because it is deliberately arranging elements in a way to affect the senses or emotions. Graffiti can also be thought-out as an art that vandalizes property if it is carried out without permission.
Today, graffiti is considered as a form of vandalism, not art, where graffiti artists vandalize properties such as walls, poles, telephone booths etc. Critics of graffiti artists only say what they perceive, they are not analyzing the beauty in the creation of graffiti.Read more: Is Graffiti Art or Vandalism Essay Expressing what you think shouldn’t be a crime if you’re not hurting another peer ,a simple scribble could be considered a tagging any one from any age can do that just because they don’t consider them self taggers doesn’t mean there not able to write on a wall Graffiti artists go through a lot just to make a mural.Graffiti is painting, painting is an art and an art is a way for expressing feelings, so graffiti is an art that expresses all feelings in every moment and every place. Many people think graffiti is a crime because they do not know what it means, also they think it is a waste of time and money because making is too expensive and it lasts too much.
Graffiti Art: An Essay Concerning The Recognition of Some Forms of Graffiti As Art.. For in actuality, spraycan art does not necessarily have to be illegal or on a wall to be considered as graffiti art, although,. The evaluative concerns actually play more into where, when, and how graffiti art should be displayed.
Debate: Should Graffiti Be Considered an Art Form or Vandalism? The definition of Graffiti, according to the Oxford dictionary - 'Writing or drawings scribbled, scratched, or sprayed illicitly on a wall or other surface in a public place'.
Art is a very diverse subject, and with all the art forms that we have nowadays, there is no reason why graffiti should not be considered art.” Ninth-grader, Rose F., said, “Graffiti is vandalism because some have a purpose or message, but others are just meaningless.”.
Graffiti covers the walls of freeways, bridges and buildings, showcasing the talent of those who create the beautiful imagery. It continues to become more widespread despite the ongoing debate of whether or not it is vandalism. This street art beautifies cities by giving them character and making them look unique and personal. As a non-violent.
Graffiti Art. Graffiti is the art of regular people; these people are not considered artists but the criminalised voice of the populace. For most artists, gaining recognition and selling their works for high-prices is a life-long aspiration and for the most recognition doesn’t happen before death.
Perhaps if there were more art classes for youth and youth at risk, graffiti vandalism would not be such a problem. Graffiti is vandalism, especially when it hurts the community. Factoring in post graffiti clean-up and budgetary consequences, this “art” is just not worth the cost.
Graffiti has been around for hundreds of years and I believe that some types of graffiti should be considered art. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint what is important to them all around the cities.
Do you think graffiti could be considered a form of art therapy Do you need help with your Do you think graffiti could be considered a form of art therapy? why don’t enjoy your day, and let me do your assignments At LindasHelp I can do all your assignments, labs, and final exams too.
Home — Essay Samples — Crime — Vandalism — Should Graffiti Be Treated as Art? This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Graffiti Persuasive. One common objection is that graffiti is not art because it is vandalism and hence a criminal act. While it is true that it can be vandalism and a criminal act, these facts would not seem to have a bearing on its status of being art. The mere fact that something is illegal or classified as vandalism hardly seems sufficient to make something fall outside of the realm of art.
Graffiti is art, not vandalism. Graffiti, like the many murals around Philadelphia, is a form of art and should be appreciated, not condemned. 16 January 2018 Rae Burach Commentary, Opinion.. Instead of being considered a meaningful expression, graffiti is seen as vandalism.
Stuck on your essay? Browse essays about Graffiti and find inspiration. Learn by example and become a better writer with Kibin’s suite of essay help services.
Graffiti is art and we have to use art to be able to make graffiti as shown in todays daily life. people might make money off of it but we surly don’t just think there work is bad. There work practically makes up our cities today.We should appreciate what those people do.
However, freedom should be an act in consideration and respect to the public, marking or tagging on public spaces without the consent of the owner can be illegal. If Graffiti is considered art, it should at least be done right and legally. In conclusion, Graffiti is not a form of art that should be promoted.